Showing information for HMDB0013609 ('trp', 'tryptophan')


Metabolite information

HMDB ID HMDB0013609
Synonyms
D-Tryptophane
D-Trytophane
D-[+]-Tryptophan
D-alpha-amino-3-Indolepropionic acid
DL-Tryptophan
DTR
H-D-TRP-OH
H-delta-TRP-OH
Tryptophan
[+]-Tryptophan
[2R]-2-amino-3-[1H-indol-3-yl]Propanoate
[2R]-2-amino-3-[1H-indol-3-yl]Propanoic acid
[R]-2-amino-3-[3-Indolyl]propionic acid
[R]-Tryptophan
[R]-[+]-2-amino-3-[3-Indolyl]propionic acid
delta-Tryptophane
delta-Trytophane
delta-[+]-Tryptophan
delta-alpha-amino-3-Indolepropionic acid
Chemical formula C11H12N2O2
IUPAC name
(2R)-2-amino-3-(1H-indol-3-yl)propanoic acid
CAS registry number 153-94-6
Monisotopic molecular weight 204.089877638

Chemical taxonomy

Super class Organoheterocyclic compounds
Class Indoles and derivatives
Sub class Indolyl carboxylic acids and derivatives

Biological properties

Pahtways
Author-emphasized biomarker in the paper(s)

Lung cancer metabolomics studies that identify HMDB0013609 ('trp', 'tryptophan')


Reference Country Specimen Marker function Participants (Case) Participants (Control)
Cancer type Stage Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status Type Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status
Sappington et al. 2018 lymph node aspirates diagnosis adenocarcinoma II, III, IV 31 17, 14 squamous cell carcinoma 19 14, 5
Fahrmann et al. 2015 serum diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 43 21, 22 67.3 ± 10.10 healthy 43 21, 22 65.9 ± 8.05
Maeda et al. 2010 plasma NSCLC I, II, III, IV 141 93, 48 62.7 ± 9.2 former, current, non-smoker healthy 423 279, 144 61.1 ± 8.7 former, current, non-smoker
Fahrmann et al. 2015 plasma diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 43 21, 22 67.3 ± 10.10 healthy 43 21, 22 65.9 ± 8.05
Miyamoto et al. 2015 blood diagnosis NSCLC, SCLC, mesothelioma, secondary metastasis to lung I, II, III, IV 11 4, 7 67 (61-73) / 67 (47-76) smoker, non-smoker healthy 11 5, 6 69 (61-83) / 54 (44-61) unknown
Fahrmann et al. 2015 serum diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 49 17, 32 65.9 ± 9.87 healthy 31 11, 20 64.1 ± 8.97
Klupczynska et al. 2016a serum diagnosis adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma I, II, III 90 58, 32 64 (48-86) current, non-smoker, unknown healthy 63 41, 22 62 (43-78) smoker, non-smoker, unknown
An et al. 2010 urine diagnosis adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, SCLC 19 61 ± 8.4 healthy 22
Miyamoto et al. 2015 blood diagnosis adenocarcinoma unknown (mostly late stage) 18 10, 8 67 (50-85) / 62 (53-72) former, current healthy 20 8, 12 64 (49-80) / 66 (58-82) former, current
Sappington et al. 2018 lymph node aspirates diagnosis adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma II, III, IV 50 31, 19 non-malignant 29 15, 14
Fahrmann et al. 2015 plasma diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 52 17, 35 65.9 ± 9.66 healthy 31 11, 20 64.1 ± 8.97
Mazzone et al. 2016 serum adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma I, II, III 94 55.3%, 44.7% 68.7 at-risk controls 190 50.5%, 49.5% 66.2
An et al. 2010 urine diagnosis adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, SCLC 19 61 ± 8.4 healthy 22
Moreno et al. 2018 tissue therapy, diagnosis squamous cell carcinoma I, II, III 35 35, 0 68.71 ± 7.46 tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 35 35, 0 68.71 ± 7.46
Moreno et al. 2018 tissue therapy, diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III 33 24, 9 62.11 ± 9.73 tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 33 24, 9 62.11 ± 9.73
Wikoff et al. 2015b tissue diagnosis adenocarcinoma I 39 15, 24 72.33 ± 8.78 smoker, non-smoker tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 39 15, 24 72.33 ± 8.78 smoker, non-smoker
Reference Chromatography Ion source Positive/Negative mode Mass analyzer Identification level
Sappington et al. 2018 LC ESI positive Q-TOF MS/MS
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Maeda et al. 2010 LC ESI positive quadrupole
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Miyamoto et al. 2015 GC EI TOF MS/MS
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Klupczynska et al. 2016a LC QTRAP MS/MS
An et al. 2010 LC APCI positive Q-TOF MS/MS
Miyamoto et al. 2015 GC EI TOF MS/MS
Sappington et al. 2018 LC ESI positive Q-TOF MS/MS
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Mazzone et al. 2016 LC ESI positive linear ion-trap MS/MS
An et al. 2010 LC ESI positive Q-TOF MS/MS
Moreno et al. 2018 LC, GC ESI, EI positive, negative LC: linear ion‐trap, GC: single‐quadrupole LC: MS/MS
Moreno et al. 2018 LC, GC ESI, EI positive, negative LC: linear ion‐trap, GC: single‐quadrupole LC: MS/MS
Wikoff et al. 2015b GC EI TOF
Reference Data processing software Database search
Sappington et al. 2018 MassHunter, MassProfilerProfessional HMDB
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Maeda et al. 2010 Xcalibur
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Miyamoto et al. 2015 ChromaTOF software (Leco) UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Klupczynska et al. 2016a
An et al. 2010 MZmine 2 beta HMDB, PubChem compound database, METLIN, KEGG
Miyamoto et al. 2015 ChromaTOF software (Leco) UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Sappington et al. 2018 MassHunter, MassProfilerProfessional HMDB
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Mazzone et al. 2016 Metabolon LIMS system Metabolon LIMS system
An et al. 2010 MZmine 2 beta HMDB, PubChem compound database, METLIN, KEGG
Moreno et al. 2018 KEGG, HMDB
Moreno et al. 2018 KEGG, HMDB
Wikoff et al. 2015b BinBase NIST11, BinBase
Reference Difference method Mean concentration (case) Mean concentration (control) Fold change (case/control) P-value FDR VIP
Sappington et al. 2018 OPLS-DA, PLS-DA 0.98 0.92
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 30367 ± 8595 30696 ± 10252 0.989 0.883 0.96
Maeda et al. 2010 Mann-Whitney U-test, PCA 59.3 ± 12 μM 59.8±10.9 μM 0.67
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 14276 ± 4817 15614 ± 6000 0.91 0.505 0.74
Miyamoto et al. 2015 Analysis of Covariance 126620.909090909 139425.727272727 0.908160291272708 0.390895321684418
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 30547 ± 10083 33738 ± 10507 0.91 0.269 0.6
Klupczynska et al. 2016a t-test, Welch’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test, one-way ANOVA 42.43±13 ?M 45.51±9.94 ?M 0.93 0.0983
An et al. 2010 independent t-test 0.014
Miyamoto et al. 2015 Analysis of Covariance 121513.055555556 143382.65 0.847473913723561 0.00508079314680403
Sappington et al. 2018 OPLS-DA, PLS-DA 0.59 0.0027
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 17526 ± 10639 24922 ± 9245 0.7 0.001 0.047
Mazzone et al. 2016 two- sample independent t test 0.945816± 0.1884884 1.038218± 0.2242702 0.910999424013068 0.0006709 0.015006832
An et al. 2010 independent t-test 0.00065
Moreno et al. 2018 paired two‐sample t‐test, PLS-DA 2.1647293571205 0.0000052274965518423 0.0000118847357503423
Moreno et al. 2018 paired two‐sample t‐test, PLS-DA 2.11885230771592 0.00000000814386903587192 0.000000274598387531254
Wikoff et al. 2015b OPLS-DA 1.2 0.837
Reference Classification method Cutoff value AUROC 95%CI Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%)
Sappington et al. 2018
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest
Maeda et al. 2010 ROC curve combination of 21 amino acid: 0.812
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest maltose+maltotriose+cystine+3-Phosphoglycerate+citrulline+pyrophosphate+tryptophan+adenosine-5-Phosphate=0.670 (0.552, 0.789) 39.5 maltose+maltotriose+cystine+3-Phosphoglycerate+citrulline+pyrophosphate+tryptophan=60.5 65.1 maltose+maltotriose+cystine+3-Phosphoglycerate+citrulline+pyrophosphate+tryptophan=93.0 52.3 maltose+maltotriose+cystine+3-Phosphoglycerate+citrulline+pyrophosphate+tryptophan=76.7
Miyamoto et al. 2015
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest
Klupczynska et al. 2016a ROC curve analysis (Monte-Carlo cross validation), discriminant function analysis 0.572 alanine+histidine+ornithine+isoleucine+tryptophan+valine=84.4 alanine+histidine+ornithine+isoleucine+tryptophan+valine=52.4
An et al. 2010
Miyamoto et al. 2015
Sappington et al. 2018
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest maltose+maltotriose+cystine+3-Phosphoglycerate+citrulline+pyrophosphate+tryptophan+adenosine-5-Phosphate=0.883 (0.812, 0.955) 50.6 maltose+maltotriose+cystine+3-Phosphoglycerate+citrulline+pyrophosphate+tryptophan=77.1
Mazzone et al. 2016
An et al. 2010
Moreno et al. 2018
Moreno et al. 2018
Wikoff et al. 2015b