Showing information for HMDB0001262 ('maltotriose')


Metabolite information

HMDB ID HMDB0001262
Synonyms
4-O-[4-O-Hexopyranosylhexopyranosyl]hexose
Amylotriose
Cucurbits
Cytoplasma
D-[+]-Maltotriose
Digestion
Extracellular region
Faecal
Faeces
Fauna
Fecal
Flora
Gourds
Gramineae
Kidneys
Legume
O-alpha-D-Glucopyranosyl-[1beta94]-O-alpha-D-glucopyranosyl-[1beta94]-O-alpha-D-glucose
O-alpha-delta-Glucopyranosyl-[1beta94]-O-alpha-delta-glucopyranosyl-[1beta94]-O-alpha-delta-glucose
Papilionoideae
Pd
Prostate gland
Soy
Soya
Soya bean
Soybean
Stool
delta-[+]-Maltotriose
Chemical formula C18H32O16
IUPAC name
(2R,3R,4S,5S,6R)-2-{[(2R,3S,4R,5R,6R)-4,5-dihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-6-{[(2R,3S,4R,5R)-4,5,6-trihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-3-yl]oxy}oxan-3-yl]oxy}-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-3,4,5-triol
CAS registry number 1109-28-0
Monisotopic molecular weight 504.169034976

Chemical taxonomy

Super class Organic oxygen compounds
Class Organooxygen compounds
Sub class Carbohydrates and carbohydrate conjugates

Biological properties

Pahtways
Galactose Metabolism
Author-emphasized biomarker in the paper(s)

Lung cancer metabolomics studies that identify HMDB0001262 ('maltotriose')


Reference Country Specimen Marker function Participants (Case) Participants (Control)
Cancer type Stage Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status Type Number Gender (M,F) Age mean (range) (M/F) Smoking status
Fahrmann et al. 2015 serum diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 49 17, 32 65.9 ± 9.87 healthy 31 11, 20 64.1 ± 8.97
Moreno et al. 2018 tissue therapy, diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III 33 24, 9 62.11 ± 9.73 tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 33 24, 9 62.11 ± 9.73
Fahrmann et al. 2015 serum diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 43 21, 22 67.3 ± 10.10 healthy 43 21, 22 65.9 ± 8.05
Fahrmann et al. 2015 plasma diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 43 21, 22 67.3 ± 10.10 healthy 43 21, 22 65.9 ± 8.05
Moreno et al. 2018 tissue therapy, diagnosis squamous cell carcinoma I, II, III 35 35, 0 68.71 ± 7.46 tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 35 35, 0 68.71 ± 7.46
Fahrmann et al. 2015 plasma diagnosis adenocarcinoma I, II, III, IV 52 17, 35 65.9 ± 9.66 healthy 31 11, 20 64.1 ± 8.97
Wikoff et al. 2015b tissue diagnosis adenocarcinoma I 39 15, 24 72.33 ± 8.78 smoker, non-smoker tumor vs. adjacent normal tissue 39 15, 24 72.33 ± 8.78 smoker, non-smoker
Reference Chromatography Ion source Positive/Negative mode Mass analyzer Identification level
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Moreno et al. 2018 LC, GC ESI, EI positive, negative LC: linear ion‐trap, GC: single‐quadrupole LC: MS/MS
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Moreno et al. 2018 LC, GC ESI, EI positive, negative LC: linear ion‐trap, GC: single‐quadrupole LC: MS/MS
Fahrmann et al. 2015 GC EI TOF
Wikoff et al. 2015b GC EI TOF
Reference Data processing software Database search
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Moreno et al. 2018 KEGG, HMDB
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Moreno et al. 2018 KEGG, HMDB
Fahrmann et al. 2015 UC Davis Metabolomics BinBase database
Wikoff et al. 2015b BinBase NIST11, BinBase
Reference Difference method Mean concentration (case) Mean concentration (control) Fold change (case/control) P-value FDR VIP
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 132 ± 114 96 ± 31 1.38 0.039 0.3
Moreno et al. 2018 paired two‐sample t‐test, PLS-DA 0.610218585894929 0.0250176276929168 0.0427343912731147
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 136 ± 54 109 ± 39 1.25 0.003 0.037
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 133 ± 107 97 ± 146 1.36 0.003 0.038
Moreno et al. 2018 paired two‐sample t‐test, PLS-DA 0.461192238607395 0.000595905238769401 0.000978461688349757
Fahrmann et al. 2015 regress (by the covariates: age, gender and smoking history [packs per year]), permutation test 344 ± 295 180 ± 209 1.91 0 0.007
Wikoff et al. 2015b OPLS-DA 1.7 0.615
Reference Classification method Cutoff value AUROC 95%CI Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%)
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest
Moreno et al. 2018
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest maltose+maltotriose+cystine+3-Phosphoglycerate+citrulline=0.699 (0.583, 0.815) maltose+maltotriose+cystine+3-Phosphoglycerate+citrulline+pyrophosphate+tryptophan+adenosine-5-Phosphate=0.670 (0.552, 0.789) 79.1 maltose+maltotriose=67.4 48.8 maltose+maltotriose=59.3 64 maltose+maltotriose=63.4
Moreno et al. 2018
Fahrmann et al. 2015 random forest maltose+maltotriose+cystine+3-Phosphoglycerate+citrulline=0.880 (0.805, 0.954) maltose+maltotriose+cystine+3-Phosphoglycerate+citrulline+pyrophosphate+tryptophan+adenosine-5-Phosphate=0.883 (0.812, 0.955) 71.1 maltose+maltotriose=71.7
Wikoff et al. 2015b