Metabolite information |
|
HMDB ID | HMDB0002117 |
Synonyms |
(9Z)-9-Octadecenamide(9Z)-Octadec-9-enamide(Z)-9-Octadecenamide(Z)-Octadec-9-enoate amide(Z)-Octadec-9-enoic acid amide(cis)-9-Octadecenoate(cis)-9-Octadecenoic acid(cis)-9-Octadecenoic acid amide14C-Labeled oleamide9,10-Octadecenamide9-Octadecenamide9Z-OctadecenamideAdogen 73Aliphatic amideAmide OArmid OArmoslip CPCrodamide OCrodamide orDiamide O 200Diamit O 200ELDElaidoylamideKemamide OOctadecene amideOleate amideOleic acid amideOleyl amideOleylamideOleylamide, (e)-isomerPetrac slip-ezePolydis TR 121Slip-ezeTocris-0878Unislip 1759cis-9,10-Octadecenoamidetrans-9,10-Octadecenoamide |
Chemical formula | C18H35NO |
IUPAC name | (9Z)-octadec-9-enamide |
CAS registry number | 301-02-0 |
Monoisotopic molecular weight | 281.271864747 |
Chemical taxonomy |
|
Super class | Lipids and lipid-like molecules |
Class | Fatty Acyls |
Sub class | Fatty amides |
Biological properties |
|
Pathways (Pathway Details in HMDB) |
|
Reference | Country | Specimen | Marker function | Participants (Case) | Participants (Control) | |||||||||
Cancer type | Stage | Number | Gender (M,F) | Age mean (range) (M/F) | Smoking status | Type | Number | Gender (M,F) | Age mean (range) (M/F) | Smoking status | ||||
Guo et al. 2012 | China | serum | diagnosis | adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, SCLC | I, II, III, IV | 58 | 39, 19 | 52 ± 12 / 52 ± 12 | – | healthy | 495 | 251, 244 | 61 ± 10 / 63 ± 12 | – |
Li et al. 2014 | China | serum | diagnosis | NSCLC, SCLC | – | 23 | 12, 11 | 63.0 ± 9.8 / 59.4 ± 5.8 | – | healthy | 23 | 11, 12 | 51.0 ± 11.1 / 56.3 ± 14.3 | – |
Chen et al. 2015b | China | serum | – | lung cancer | – | 30 | – | 61.58 ± 10.67 | – | healthy | 30 | – | 60.35 ± 12.48 | – |
Chen et al. 2015b | China | serum | – | lung cancer | – | 30 | – | 61.58 ± 10.67 | – | before vs. after treatment (operation) | 30 | – | 61.58 ± 10.67 | – |
Reference | Chromatography | Ion source | Positive/Negative mode | Mass analyzer | Identification level |
Guo et al. 2012 | DI | ESI | positive | FT-ICR | MS/MS |
Li et al. 2014 | LC | – | positive | Q-TOF | MS/MS |
Chen et al. 2015b | LC | ESI | positive | Q-TOF | – |
Chen et al. 2015b | LC | ESI | positive | Q-TOF | – |
Reference | Data processing software | Database search |
Guo et al. 2012 | – | HMDB, Lipid maps |
Li et al. 2014 | MarkerLynx | METLIN, HMDB, KEGG |
Chen et al. 2015b | Mass Hunter Qualitative Analysis Software (Agilent Technologies) | METLIN |
Chen et al. 2015b | Mass Hunter Qualitative Analysis Software (Agilent Technologies) | METLIN |
Reference | Difference method | Mean concentration (case) | Mean concentration (control) | Fold change (case/control) | P-value | FDR | VIP |
Guo et al. 2012 | PLS-DA, | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Li et al. 2014 | PCA, PLS-DA, OSC-PLS-DA, student’s t-test | – | – | – | 0.05 | – | 1.70 |
Chen et al. 2015b | PCA, PLS-DA, independent t test | – | – | 1.47 | 1.00e-03 | – | 1.39 |
Chen et al. 2015b | PCA, PLS-DA, independent t test | – | – | 1.35 | 1.00e-03 | – | 1.38 |
Reference | Classification method | Cutoff value | AUROC 95%CI | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) |
Guo et al. 2012 | ROC curve | – | male oleamide + long chain acyl carnitine: 0.883, Oleamide + Long chain acyl carnitine + LPC(18:1) + LPC(20:4) + LPC(20:3) + LPC(22:6) + SM(16:0/1): 0.983, female oleamide + long chain acyl carnitine: 0.879, Oleamide + Long chain acyl carnitine + LPC(18:1) + LPC(20:4) + LPC(20:3) + LPC(22:6) + SM(16:0/1): 0.993 | male oleamide + long chain acyl carnitine:87.2, Oleamide + Long chain acyl carnitine + LPC(18:1) + LPC(20:4) + LPC(20:3) + LPC(22:6) + SM(16:0/1): 100, female oleamide + long chain acyl carnitine:78.9, Oleamide + Long chain acyl carnitine + LPC(18:1) + LPC(20:4) + LPC(20:3) + LPC(22:6) + SM(16:0/1): 100 | male oleamide + long chain acyl carnitine: 84.1, Oleamide + Long chain acyl carnitine + LPC(18:1) + LPC(20:4) + LPC(20:3) + LPC(22:6) + SM(16:0/1): 100, female oleamide + long chain acyl carnitine: 92.3, Oleamide + Long chain acyl carnitine + LPC(18:1) + LPC(20:4) + LPC(20:3) + LPC(22:6) + SM(16:0/1): 93.1 | – |
Li et al. 2014 | ROC curve analysis | – | – | – | – | – |
Chen et al. 2015b | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Chen et al. 2015b | – | – | – | – | – | – |